Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Smut for Smut?

I'm conflicted on this in a lot of different ways:

At the University of Texas San Antonio campus, a college atheist group is offering students pornography in exchange for Bibles, Korans, or other religious texts. The group, Atheist Agenda, calls the exchange "Smut for Smut".
Group members claim that the Bible and other religious texts are just as as smutty as any pornography. According to the group, the Bible contains all sorts of misogyny, violence, torture and questionable sexual practices.
My first reaction to this activity was amusement, I'll admit.  There's nothing better than irreverence in comedy, and I find many things offensive to be quite funny, really.  It's clever, has a catchy slogan, and overall entertaining to think about.  I'd probably trade in a bible for porn just for the shock value alone.  Let's face it: making fun of religion is funny.  If it wasn't, I wouldn't laugh my ass off every time I heard this song:

(The animation in particular makes me giggle)

That said, I also wonder if this is as inappropriate as the qu'ran burning  last year was.  The two incidents bear some striking resemblances, as both involve desecrating what people consider sacred.  Is it as tasteless, or is there a difference in that one is rife with hypocrisy and the other treats everything as irreverent?  It's a worthy question for contemplation, and one I don't really have an answer to.  The only thing I do know is that the inappropriateness is irrelevant, because both activities are and ought to be legal.  None are truly harmed by the burning of the Qu'ran or the trading of bibles for porn, and while I equally support the right of others to protest these actions, there is and should not be anything wrong with the atheist organization doing this.  Reverence belongs to the believer, and has no place in the eyes of the nonbeliever nor the government.

At least that's my take on things.  What do you think about this incident?  Kosher or not?  I haven't given it enough thought to come to a full-on conclusion yet, and I'd like to hear the input of my friends. :)  

Monday, October 3, 2011

Fly Away, Katydid

Tonight I let my Katydid free.

It's been quite a while since I've written here, so unless you've spoken to me in the last few weeks, you wouldn't know about my katydid.  I sadly don't have a great picture of her, but here's the only one that had any clarity:

Yeah, the only good shot I get, and it's of her rump.

For Invertibrate Zoology, one of our requirements was to catch and take care of some kind of invertebrate and do a report on them.  For being so interested in biology, I'm fundamentally squeamish about touching living organisms, especially invertebrates (or vertebrates that potentially bite).  It's not much of an issue with cats, dogs, or other domesticated animals.  It's the wild ones.  Maybe it's a touch of respect for their wildness, maybe it's partly an ingrained fear of injury, or maybe I'm just constantly terrified that touching them will cause them harm, like with butterflies.  It's probably a combination of the three.  Whatever the cause, the squeamishness makes me hesitate when trying to grab something, making attempts at catching much of anything a bit of a challenge.  Thankfully, my roommate and my girlfriend were both happy to help.

My roommate and I caught a grasshopper and a pine beetle while we were in the mountains, helping his family.  I say "we" caught them, but really it was almost entirely his doing.  I wandered around, feeling oafish as everything with legs and wings hopped, ran, or flew away from me.  Still, we had them, and I started doing research, hoping to get the project over with as quickly as possible.  Both died in short order.  Thankfully, less than a week later my girlfriend and I stumbled upon this beautiful creature.  Since the picture of my actual caught organism is pretty weak, I include a stock footage of the species, hoping you'll understand if I argue that she looked "just like this."


Microcentrum rhombificum, or Greater Anglewing Katydids, are the only kind of katydid typically found in Denver proper, so it was fairly easy to identify her.  I'm slow to catch bugs, and generally squeamish about handling them, so I'll admit that it was my girlfriend who was daring and clever enough to catch her.  She held the katydid in her hands all the way back to the car, a fair distance since we were out for a walk.  She commented with amusement how the insect was tickling her hands as she walked.  We eventually put her in an empty qdoba bag for the ride home, and my roommate helped us transfer her from the bag to my cage.

For the next week I studied her, becoming comfortable with her general features and habits, all the while keeping her in her cage.  I delighted when she grew eggs, and fretted over her, misting her cage frequently and adding new and various vegetation for her consumption.  The project date came and my presentation was an astounding success.  Still, over all this time I never once touched or handled her. I watched her with keen interest and adoration, but not once even tried to make contact.  The cage was a barrier to both of us, and I preferred to keep it that way.

Tonight I decided to let her go.  It was time, really.  M. rhombificum adults typically only last until the end of October, so she wasn't likely going to live much longer anyways.  I walked out to my back porch, opened the cage, and set it down on the ground, away from me and towards the wilderness that is our backyard.  She didn't move.  I picked up the cage and studied her intently.  She continued to sit there, calmly grooming her legs, seemingly uninterested in the notion of freedom.  I set it down again and waited.

And waited.

And waited.


I picked up the cage again and stared in at her.  She stared right back at me.  Building up some nerve, I reached in and gently poked her wings, hoping the contact with a big, scary predator might cause her to consider making a break for it.  Of course, my own training should have told me that katydids, aka "leaf bugs", freeze when they suspect they're in trouble, what with their masterful ability to blend in with their environment.  Surprise, surprise, she froze.

Maybe a little shake of the cage might knock her out, I reasoned.  I was afraid to knock out the eggs she'd laid, so I gently yet firmly shook the cage, letting bits and pieces of weed, leaf, and romaine lettuce hearts shake out onto the backyard patio.  No katydid.  I tried again.  Still no katydid.  A third time and still no katydid, but finally I noticed that she had started crawling to the top of the cage.  I set it down again, hoping she'd crawl out, and she did.  I knew then that it wouldn't be long before she'd fly away, and I knew I had to seize the moment.  For all my squeamishness, if I didn't handle her at least a little bit before she was gone, I knew I'd regret it.

So I held out my finger to her and she climbed on.  I didn't grab her, didn't touch her in any way.  I let her touch me.  She stood on my finger, so content that when I put my finger next to a very tall weed she made no move to depart.  She sat there for a few minutes and I had my first opportunity to really examine her.  Without the mesh of the cage between us, she was a beautiful marvel of life.  I had come to appreciate her in an academic sense, but what I felt, sitting there in the middle of the night in my boxers and a t-shirt, was far greater than simple academia.  It was raw appreciation for the brilliance of the organism that sat on my finger. You can never have that same sensation in microbiology (no matter how awesome microbes are).

Moments later she flew away, vanishing into the night.  I went downstairs, sat down on my computer, and wrote this article.

I suppose there's a metaphor in there somewhere.

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Love

I am a sappy fool.

That's not a bad statement.  I think we as a society look too harshly on the fools in our world.  I don't think I'm an idiot, per se, just that I tend to behave and think in ways that are foolish when it comes to romance.  I toy with thoughts that are outright dumb, knowing fully well that they are dumb, and in the right moment of passion am prone to falling for them.  Sometimes I might fall for them even as I think completely and rationally about my choices, knowing it's probably not the best for my sanity or my life.  I make them because even as they are excessively foolish, they are also brilliant.

I adore romance, but not the too-serious kind.  To me the world of the heart should never be taken with too much gravitas, because such strong feelings can only be countered by a whimsical joy that pervades it.  You have to know that what you're writing, thinking, or doing is sappy, that there's a silliness to it, or the game is ruined.  To ignore the silliness in love is to risk disaster.

At least that's my take on things.  I think I've been hiding that romantic side in me for too long, not really expressing it to the world.  I've been burned many times, leaping too far or making too foolish a move at just the wrong moment, but I think in the end it was worth it.

Love, ultimately, has always been worth it.

(And no, I'm not changing my facebook status anytime soon.  I just had a long talk tonight that really put things in perspective for me.  It was good.)

Sunday, August 14, 2011

School Days, School Days...

School will soon be upon me.  As a child I might have seen the return to school with a sense of dread and fear.  Gone would be the sense of freedom, gone the days of careless play and weeklong camping trips.  These days I look with excitement.  Gone will be the sense of listlessness, gone the days of job searching and wishing I could afford to do more things.  I laugh a little as I realize I am so mad that I want to pursue effectively a career in being in school, constantly studying and refining my knowledge of the world around me.  I'm legitimately excited about this semester.  It should be fantastic.

My schedule this semester is going to be light, class-wise.  I'll be taking Virology, Invertebrate Zoology, and General Chemistry 2.  That's it.  Three classes, plus a lab.  With the way my graduation path is lined up, I'll only be taking roughly three classes a semester until I graduate.  Virology is with the same instructor I took for Genetics, and is effectively an advanced genetics course.  Since I love both the professor and the subject, it should be great.  I haven't taken a class from my Invertebrate Zoology professor, but invertebrates are interesting and I've heard good things about her.  The last class, Gen Chem 2, worries me.  It worries me a lot.  Not because I don't know or like the material, but because I don't know who the professor is yet.  The last time this happened I got stuck with one of the most boring instructors in the department, one who also happened to take roll and taught a subject I was intimately familiar with.

So this semester should be good, all told.  Add on that I'm working in the student labs (for free) doing independent research/study with my absolute favorite teacher, and this semester keeps sounding better and better!

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Way to go, Matt Damon

I have to admit, I'm a big fan of Matt Damon.  Everything I've heard him say outside of acting makes me like him.  This recent video I am happy to include among the evidence for "Matt Damon is awesome:"


Reason.tv is a libertarian organization.  I've had some people suggest I might be libertarian, but this video is evidence to the contrary.  Having (mostly) gone through the teacher program at my university, and having several good friends who are teachers, I wholeheartedly agree with Matt Damon's approach.  The idea of taking away "job security" among teachers is silly.  I don't know exactly where I stand on the pension issue, exactly, but it seems like the gut reaction most people have when there are education problems is to blame the teachers.  Yes, there are bad teachers.  Yes, we should try to figure out a way to encourage good teachers and teaching habits.  The issue is minor compared to many other driving issues in education.

I remain hopeful for education, even if I'm going going into the career anymore.

Friday, July 29, 2011

Fell Through the Cracks a Bit, didn't it?

I have nothing to apologize for, of course.  Those few amazingly awesome friends who read my blog aren't holding their breaths in eager anticipation for my next musings.  The world is not going to explode, nor implode, if I don't share my thoughts about x, y, or z.

Yet I still feel guilty for not posting over the last month or so.

Obviously the Fat Friday thing has been put on hold, mostly because I became fairly convinced that the diet does, indeed, work.  I've been experimenting with just avoiding carbs when I make my own food, but I've found it's too lax an excuse.  I'm stable at 314 (net loss of 16 lbs from starting the diet), but I haven't really changed from that weight in 3-4 weeks.  I need to go back to forcing myself to keep with the lifestyle if I want to lose weight, and I'd really like to break 300 before Christmas.  It's a silly little thing, I know, but I haven't weighed less than 300 since high school.

On the other hand, losing weight still isn't a primary objective for me or my life.  I'm convinced the diet works, and it works well.  I'm also convinced that life is too short to completely cut yourself off from the experiences you love, and if the experience you love happens to be a giant warm chocolate chip cookie with ice cream and caramel on top, well, it's not the end of the world if I deviate from the diet now and again to enjoy that.

So that's really that about the Fat Friday segment.  I suspect I'll want to write about something else for a change.  Maybe the deficit, which is terrifying me with its "low but possible chance of losing all workstudy if no one can compromise" nature.  Not tonight, though.  Definitely not tonight.

Tonight is a time for sleep.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Done with Dawkins

Richard Dawkins is an amazing writer and has contributed a great deal towards the atheist and skeptical movements.  I enjoyed several of his books and think of him as an intellectual giant, with wit and wisdom by the dozen.  What I find myself not enjoying, however, is his views outside of the narrow realm of biology and atheism.

First came last year, when he gave a speech at TAM speaking harshly about those who enjoy fantasy literature, which was mildly irritating yet overall no major issue; after all, everyone has a right to their opinion, and as weird as it seemed to me at the time I'm generally not the type of person to worry about that sort of thing.  Now, however, he's having a go against feminism, specifically Rebecca Watson of Skepchic.  It's late and I'm braindead, so I won't go into too much detail about the case, but you can read all about it here.  This include's Dawkin's response to a video she made where, almost in passing, she commented on how creepy it was that a guy invited her into his hotel room while in an elevator.  I copy and paste Dawkins' reply here:


Dear Muslima
Stop whining, will you. Yes, yes, I know you had your genitals mutilated with a razor blade, and . . . yawn . . . don’t tell me yet again, I know you aren’t allowed to drive a car, and you can’t leave the house without a male relative, and your husband is allowed to beat you, and you’ll be stoned to death if you commit adultery. But stop whining, will you. Think of the suffering your poor American sisters have to put up with.
Only this week I heard of one, she calls herself Skep”chick”, and do you know what happened to her? A man in a hotel elevator invited her back to his room for coffee. I am not exaggerating. He really did. He invited her back to his room for coffee. Of course she said no, and of course he didn’t lay a finger on her, but even so . . .
And you, Muslima, think you have misogyny to complain about! For goodness sake grow up, or at least grow a thicker skin.
Richard
Yick.

One of the worst arguments you can make when dealing with issues is to point out that "someone else has it worse."  It's unfeeling and logically unsound.  I could understand if Rebecca Watson had made a giant issue about it, but having watched the youtube video this all originated with, she wasn't making ludicrous claims or expressing anything other than a side note about a guy who probably should've thought about the situation he was creating and didn't.  Dawkins' response was uncalled for.

I could add more, but I fear this may be rambly enough as it is.  It's currently 3am (and I'm feeling lonely) and my brain isn't really "on" anymore.